Perivascular epithelioid cell tumour-mimicking retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma
- 1 Surgery, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania, USA
- 2 Surgery, Banner University Medical Center South, Tucson, Arizona, USA
- Correspondence to Dr Shirin Siddiqi; ssiddiqi@conemaugh.org
Abstract
A young man in his 40s was evaluated in the emergency department for abdominal and right flank pain. A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed a solid, well-circumscribed lesion measuring 7.1×8.1×5.4 cm, which was arising from the retroperitoneum and extending from the third portion of the duodenum towards the right kidney. A percutaneous core biopsy was obtained, demonstrating an atypical smooth muscle neoplasm suggestive of a low-grade leiomyosarcoma. The patient underwent surgery for an en-block resection of the mass and the final pathology confirmed a perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm without significant pleomorphism, mitosis or necrosis. Our case adds to the small number of perivascular epithelioid cell tumour cases reported in the literature and we present it in order to increase our understanding of this tumour and to assist in its appropriate diagnosis and management.
Background
Perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa) is a rare mesenchymal tumour and is defined by the presence of perivascular epithelioid cells coexpressing both myogenic markers (actin, desmin, myosin, calponin) and melanocytic markers (Human Melanoma Black-45 (HMB-45), Melan A (Mart 1), Mitf).1 PEComas occur in a variety of visceral, cutaneous and soft tissue sites throughout the body.2–6 We report a rare case of a retroperitoneal PEComa mimicking a leiomyosarcoma.
Case presentation
A young man in his 40s was evaluated in the emergency department for abdominal and right flank pain. A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed a solid, well-circumscribed lesion measuring 7.1×8.1×5.4 cm, which was arising from the retroperitoneum and extending from the third portion of the duodenum towards the right kidney (figure 1). A percutaneous core needle biopsy was obtained, demonstrating an atypical smooth muscle neoplasm suggestive of a low-grade leiomyosarcoma. The patient underwent resection of the mass with an en-block multivisceral resection of the right kidney, the right adrenal gland, partial lateral resection of the second portion of the duodenum and a partial lateral resection of the inferior vena cava. The final pathology confirmed a perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm without significant pleomorphism, mitosis or necrosis.
Right retroperitoneal mass on CT of abdomen and pelvis.
Investigations
-
CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed a large, well-demarcated solid lesion arising from the retroperitoneum with a differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), lymphoma, neuroendocrine tumour and retroperitoneal sarcoma.
-
Tumour markers, including cancer antigen 19–9, carcinoembryonic antigen and chromogranin A, were all negative.
-
Percutaneous core needle biopsy was suggestive of low-grade leiomyosarcoma due to histologic finding of spindle cells with atypia, and positive immunohistochemical staining for desmin, vimentin and alpha smooth muscle actin (SMA).
-
Positron emission tomography/CT imaging for staging for distal metastasis showed hypermetabolic mass in right mid abdomen with few, non-specific adjacent lymph nodes
-
Histology including immunohistochemical staining.
Differential diagnosis
The CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed a large, well-demarcated solid lesion arising from the retroperitoneum with a differential diagnosis of GIST, lymphoma, neuroendocrine tumour and retroperitoneal sarcoma.
Our initial diagnosis of low-grade leiomyosarcoma on core needle biopsy was supported by histologic finding of spindle cells with atypia, and positive immunohistochemical staining for desmin, vimentin and alpha SMA.
Our final diagnosis of PEComa was supported with a histologic finding of small bundles and nests of spindle to epithelioid neoplastic cells with clear to pale eosinophilic cytoplasm and a perivascular pattern of growth as well as positive immunohistochemical staining for cathepsin K, caldesmon and HMB-45.
Treatment
Exploratory laparotomy, resection of the retroperitoneal mass, with an en-block multivisceral resection, which included the right kidney, the right adrenal gland, partial lateral resection of the second portion of the duodenum, and a partial lateral resection of the inferior vena cava.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient tolerated the procedure well without major complications. He developed an acute kidney injury on postoperative day 2, which resolved with intravenous fluids. He was discharged on the seventh postoperative day. The final pathology showed a perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm supported by the presence of small bundles and nests of bland plump spindle to epithelioid neoplastic cells with clear to pale eosinophilic cytoplasm and a perivascular pattern of growth. The neoplastic cells were noted to be uniform without significant pleomorphism, mitosis or necrosis. The immunohistochemical stains performed were positive for cathepsin K, caldesmon, HMB-45 and focally positive for MiTF, desmin and SMA, supporting the diagnosis. A microscopic examination of the mass did not demonstrate invasion of the duodenum. However, there was a focal area of invasion of the renal parenchyma. On a 2-month postoperative follow-up, the patient remains in good health and without evidence of recurrent disease.
Discussion
PEComa is a rare mesenchymal tumour with unclear precursor cells. Various theories exist regarding its origin, including derivation from undifferentiated cells of the neural crest, since they express many melanocytic and muscular markers. Another theory suggests an origin from telocytes as the markers expressed in telocytes (eg, S-100, SMA, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)) are also expressed in PEComas.7 PEComas present with non-specific clinical signs. Symptoms rely on the different organs involved and can include abdominal pain, melena, bowel obstruction, weight loss and anaemia. Some primary sites of PEComa include the retroperitoneum, uterus, vulva, gastrointestinal tract (oesophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, rectum), heart, breast, urinary bladder, abdominal wall, skin, mesentery, oral cavity, pancreas and liver. Women are more commonly affected than men, and these tumours are more frequently seen in the fourth and fifth decades of life.8 Imaging studies are not sufficiently sensitive to make the diagnosis of PEComas. Most PEComas are well-circumscribed masses with homogenous density on CT and are hypodense to isodense on CT, hypodense to isointense on T1-weighted imaging and heterogeneously hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging. The enhancement characteristics of PEComas in general are very variable. Although one study found that 21of 32 PEComas showed intense enhancement, there are other case reports that describe PEComas as hypovascular masses.9 10 Necrosis, calcifications and haemorrhage within the tumour have also been described.11 Given its non-specific radiographic imaging characteristics, PEComas can be easily misdiagnosed.
PEComas are generally composed of a mixture of blood vessels, smooth muscle cells and adipose tissue. The tumour cells are either epithelioid or spindle arranged in bands, nests or swirls. The spindle tumour cells are usually arranged in bundles and have an eosinophilic cytoplasm. The epithelioid cells appear with bright and finely granulated cytoplasm. The nuclei tend to be relatively small and round-to-oval shaped and are centrally located within the cells. Blood vessels are distributed in clusters and arranged around tumour cells. The vessel lumen is irregularly dilated, twisted or dysmorphic. The vessel walls are not consistent in thickness and exhibit variable levels of hyalinisation or amyloidosis. PEComas demonstrate breakage in the elastic fibres in both the internal and external lamina of blood vessels, which causes the vessels to be prone to spontaneous rupturing and haemorrhaging. The amount of mature adipose tissue varies from predominant to absent and displays a grey-pink or pale coloration with a yellowish appearance.12 Immunohistochemical features demonstrate positive staining for Cathepsin K (100%), HMB-45 (98%), SMA (81%), caldesmon (75%), desmin (67–80%), MiTF (66–83%), MelanA/MART1(58–67%).13 14 Immunohistochemical features demonstrate negative staining for S-100 and AE1/AE3. The histologic description of PEComa bears a resemblance to that of an angiomyolipoma, which also has a classic triphasic composition: myoid spindle cells, mature adipose tissue and dysmorphic thick walled blood vessels without elastic lamina. However, the fat component in an angiomyolipoma is in the form of mature adipose tissue, the vascular component is in the form of thick walled hyalinized vessels, and the epitheliod cells contain a clear or densely eosinophilic cytoplasm with large hyperchromatic bizarre nuclei that is multilobated.
Our initial diagnosis of low-grade leiomyosarcoma on core needle biopsy was made based on the histologic identification of spindle cells with atypia and positive immunohistochemical staining for desmin, vimentin and SMA (figure 2). Our final diagnosis of PEComa was supported by the histologic finding of small bundles and nests of spindle to epithelioid neoplastic cells with clear to pale eosinophilic cytoplasm and a perivascular pattern of growth. The neoplastic cells did not demonstrate pleomorphism, mitosis or necrosis. Immunohistochemical stains showed that the neoplastic cells were positive for Cathepsin K, caldesmon, HMB-45, MiTF, desmin and SMA (figures 2 and 3). The specimen did not stain for S-100 distinguishing it from melanoma (figure 4).
Smooth muscle actin stain of the biopsy sample found in both leiomyosarcoma and perivascular epithelioid cell tumour. Arrow points to the cytoplasmic staining of the sample.
Human Melanoma Black-45 (HMB-45) stain is taken up by both melanoma and perivascular epithelioid cell tumour but not by leiomyosarcoma. Arrow points to the nuclear staining of the sample.
Biopsy sample without uptake of S-100 protein stain, differentiating it from a melanoma. Notice the absence of nuclear or cytoplasmic staining of the sample.
Both leiomyosarcoma and PEComa present with nuclear atypia and tumour cell necrosis.15 An important histologic distinction between leiomyosarcoma and PEComa is the absence of thin and delicate vessels seen in leiomyosarcoma. Furthermore, leiomyosarcomas do not stain for melanocytic markers, which is unlike PEComas. Finally, the absence of mature adipocytes as the predominant cell type differentiates PEComas from angiomyolipomas.
Due to the rarity of PEComas, standardised treatment protocols are not available. Surgical excision remains the treatment of choice for localised PEComas while adjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy or radiotherapy has little efficacy. However, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors is emerging as promising targeted therapy for malignant PEComa.7 16 17 PEComas with two or more of the following characteristics are considered high risk for local recurrence and distal metastasis: size >5 cm, infiltrative growth pattern, high nuclear grade, tumour necrosis, mitotic activity >1/50 HPF and vascular invasion.18 Our patient met two criteria: tumour size and renal parenchymal invasion. Surveillance with routine imaging is recommended given the high-risk features for local recurrence and distal metastasis. However, optimal surveillance recommendations for PEComa are not available in the literature and each case should undergo surveillance based on a multidisciplinary evaluation, taking into account tumour characteristics and patient factors.
This case highlights the critical role of pathology in establishing the correct diagnosis when radiographic and clinical modalities are inconclusive. The microscopic features and immunohistochemical staining patterns are essential to the correct diagnosis of PEComa and play a central role in distinguishing PEComa from other disease processes such as angiomyolipoma, melanoma and leiomyosarcoma.
Learning points
-
Perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa) is a rare tumour with unclear aetiology whose incidence is rising.
-
Differential diagnosis for large retroperitoneal masses should include PEComa.
-
PEComa can be misidentified as leiomyosarcoma on core needle biopsy.
-
Specific PEComa diagnostic criteria have been proposed to predict behaviour with 2+ features suggesting malignant behaviour: size >5 cm, infiltrative growth pattern, hyperchromic nucleus, tumour necrosis, mitotic activity >1/50 HPF and vascular invasion.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors LM: conception of work, revising for final approval, accountable for the accuracy of the submission. SS: drafting manuscript, literature search, patient communication, editing for final approval, accountable for the accuracy of the submission.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer